🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.