🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are observing closely to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing chorus of nations are exploring similar restrictions.

• The Danish government plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that phones and apps are "robbing our kids' childhood". The policy may be passed soon.
• The Norwegian government is set to implement a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to confirm the user details of social media users. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban remains "an tools under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged parliament to enact a proposal increasing the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable step, including an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in the Netherlands has advised parents to restrict their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has adopted a non-binding motion demanding a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is given. While it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these platforms, the move does not create enforceable legislation.

"A clear age restriction is a good foundation," stated a leading European lawmaker driving the initiative.

The UK: A Watchful Eye

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has remained open to a future ban, arguing that "no option is being dismissed" but insisting any policy must be "supported by robust data".

Last year, interest grew behind a legislative effort to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. However, the administration committed to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have expressed concerns. One foundation established by the family of a young person who took her own life after encountering harmful social media material argues that a blanket age ban might not protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when teens turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are secure and age appropriate for minors," commented a influential child protection advocate.

America: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, legislation is largely occurring at the regional level due to country-wide gridlock.

• The state of Utah demands guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a law barring children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a law capping minors to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with any further access dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also enacted bills requiring adult authorization for under-16s to open social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and calls from some politicians to mimic this lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

International Views

Apart from these regions, further countries are also taking action.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, international agencies adopt a more nuanced position. A major UN agency has warned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The body highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to improve user protection.

As this worldwide discussion unfolds, the steps of this nation and several other countries demonstrate that states internationally are increasingly willing to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.